Ong Kian Cheong (2009) had centred around acts and publications tending to have the latter effect. ![]() Koh Song Huat Benjamin (2005) and Public Prosecutor v. In contrast to arrests and prosecutions in the 1950s and 1960s which involved allegations of fomenting disaffection against the government, those in the 21st century such as the District Court cases of Public Prosecutor v. ![]() ![]() The Act also listed several examples of what is not a seditious tendency, and provides defences for accused persons in a limited number of situations.Ī notable feature of the Sedition Act was that in addition to punishing actions that tend to undermine the administration of government, the Act also criminalized actions which promoted feelings of ill-will or hostility between different races or classes of the population. The essential ingredient of any offence under the Act was the finding of a "seditious tendency", and the intention of the offender is irrelevant. The Sedition Act 1948 was a Singaporean statute law which prohibited seditious acts and speech and the printing, publication, sale, distribution, reproduction and importation of seditious publications. 14 of 1948, Malaya), 2020 Revised Edition-Sedition Act 1948 (Singapore)įederal Legislative Council, Federation of Malayaġ9 July 1948 (Peninsular Malaysia) extended to Singapore on
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |